ChinaNet Online Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Texas in April 2006 and re-domiciled to become a Nevada corporation in October 2006. On June 26, 2009, the Company consummated a share exchange transaction with China Net Online Media Group Limited (the “Share Exchange”), a company organized under the laws of British Virgin Islands (“China Net BVI”). As a result of the Share Exchange, China Net BVI became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and the Company is now a holding company, which, through certain contractual arrangements with operating companies in the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”), is engaged in providing advertising, precision marketing, online to offline (O2O) sales channel expansion and the related data services to small and medium enterprises (“SMEs”) and entrepreneurial management and networking services for entrepreneurs in the PRC.

The Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, China Net BVI was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands. China Net BVI is the parent holding company of CNET Online Technology Limited, a Hong Kong company (“China Net HK”), which established and is the parent company of Rise King Century Technology Development (Beijing) Co., Ltd., a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (“WFOE”) established in the PRC (“Rise King WFOE”).

To satisfy PRC laws and regulations, the Company conducts certain business in the PRC through its Variable Interest Entities (“VIEs”). Through a series of contractual agreements between Rise King WFOE and Business Opportunity Online (Beijing) Network Technology Co., Ltd. (“Business Opportunity Online”) and Beijing CNET Online Advertising Co., Ltd. (“Beijing CNET Online”) (collectively the “PRC Operating Entities” or the “VIEs”), the Company, through the WFOE, secures significant rights to influence the PRC Operating Entities’ business operations, policies and management, approve all matters requiring shareholder approval, and the right to receive 100% of the income earned by the VIEs. Pursuant to the contractual agreements, all of the equity owners' rights and obligations of the VIEs were assigned to Rise King WFOE, which resulted in the equity owners lacking the ability to make decisions that have a significant effect on the VIEs, Rise King WFOE's ability to extract the profits from the operation of the VIEs and assume the residual benefits of the VIEs. Due to the fact that Rise King WFOE and its indirect parent are the sole interest holders of the VIEs, the Company included the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses of the VIEs in its consolidated financial statements, which is consistent with the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 810 “Consolidation”, subtopic 10.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company operated its business primarily in China through its PRC subsidiaries and PRC operating entities, or VIEs as discussed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “2015 Form 10-K”).

Summarized below is the information related to the consolidated VIEs’ assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively:

All of the VIEs' assets can be used to settle obligations of their primary beneficiary. Liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating these VIEs do not represent additional claims on the Company’s general assets.

Summarized below is the information related to the financial performance of the VIEs reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively:

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements are prepared and presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

The condensed consolidated interim financial information as of June 30, 2016 and for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures, which are normally included in annual consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, have been omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations. The condensed consolidated interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto, included in the 2015 Form 10-K.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present a fair statement of the Company’s consolidated financial position as of June 30, 2016, its consolidated results of operations for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and its consolidated cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, as applicable, have been made. The interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the full fiscal year or any future periods.

The condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the financial statements of all the subsidiaries and VIEs of the Company. All transactions and balances between the Company and its subsidiaries and VIEs have been eliminated upon consolidation.

In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2015, the Company exited its brand management and sales channel building business segment, which qualified for presentation as a discontinued operation in accordance with ASC Topic 205. As a result, the results of operations of this business was reported in discontinued operation as a separate component in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for all periods presented. Certain accounts in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the six and three months ended June 30, 2015 and related notes have been retrospectively adjusted to reflect the effect of reclassification of results of operations reported in discontinued operation as a separate component.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of these condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The Company continually evaluates these estimates and assumptions based on the most recently available information, historical experience and various other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Since the use of estimates is an integral component of the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

The exchange rates used to translate amounts in RMB into US$ for the purposes of preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements are as follows:

No representation is made that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be converted into US$ at the above rates.

Advertising costs for the Company’s own brand building are not includable in cost of revenues, they are expensed when incurred or amortized over the estimated beneficial period and are included in “sales and marketing expenses” in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, advertising expenses for the Company’s own brand building were approximately US$960,000 and US$1,220,000, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, advertising expenses for the Company’s own brand building were approximately US$537,000 and US$572,000, respectively.

The Company accounts for the cost of developing and upgrading technologies and platforms and intellectual property that are used in its daily operations in research and development cost. Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. Expenses for research and development for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were approximately US$1,016,000 and US$1,063,000, respectively. Expenses for research and development for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were approximately US$590,000 and US$573,000, respectively.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date”. The amendments in this ASU defer the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year. ASU No. 2014-09, issued in May 2014, clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue and develops a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS. Simultaneously, this ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC Topic 605-Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. The core principle of this ASU requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the five steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer; (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract; (3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; (5) recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in this ASU to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adopting these amendments.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)”. The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance. The amendments clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. When another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer, an entity is required to determine whether the nature of its promise is to provide the specified good or service itself (that is, the entity is a principal) or to arrange for that good or service to be provided by the other party (that is, the entity is an agent). When (or as) an entity that is a principal satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the gross amount of consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for the specified good or service transferred to the customer. When (or as) an entity that is an agent satisfies a performance obligation, the entity recognizes revenue in the amount of any fee or commission to which it expects to be entitled in exchange for arranging for the specified good or service to be provided by the other party. An entity is a principal if it controls the specified good or service before that good or service is transferred to a customer. The guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09, which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of ASU No. 2014-09, which is deferred by ASU No. 2015-14 by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adopting these amendments.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”. The amendments in this ASU affected all entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The areas for simplification in this ASU involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. Some of the areas for simplification apply only to nonpublic entities. For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted for any entity in any interim or annual period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adopting these amendments.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing”. The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this ASU clarify the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14 defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adopting these amendments.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients”. The amendments in this ASU do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606. Rather, the amendments in this ASU affect only the narrow aspects of Topic 606, which include (1) Assessing the Collectibility Criterion and Accounting for Contracts That Do Not Meet the Criteria for Step 1; (2) Presentation of Sales Taxes and Other Similar Taxes Collected from Customers; (3) Noncash Consideration; (4) Contract Modifications at Transition Completed Contracts at Transition; (5); and (6) Technical Correction. The amendments in this ASU affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this ASU are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14 defers the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial position and results of operations upon adopting these amendments.

Term deposit as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 represented the amount of cash placed as a term deposit by one of the Company’s operating VIEs in a major financial institution in China, which management believes is of high credit quality. The term deposit matured on July 7, 2016 and was extended to July 7, 2017. The interest rate of the term deposit is 2.25% per annum.

All of the accounts receivable are non-interest bearing. Based on the assessment of the collectability of the accounts receivable as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company provided approximately US$2,875,000 and US$3,070,000 allowance for doubtful accounts, which were related to the accounts receivable of the Company’s internet advertising and TV advertising business segment with an aging over six months. For the six and three months ended June 30, 2016, no allowance for doubtful accounts was provided or reversed. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, approximately US$77,000 allowance for doubtful accounts was reversed. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, approximately US$143,000 allowance for doubtful accounts was provided. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, accounts receivable and the related allowance of approximately US$0.22 million and US$0.13 million, respectively, was decreased due to disposal of a VIE during the period.

TV advertisement deposit and prepayment receivable as of December 31, 2015 represented the uncollected portion of the deposit and prepayment made to an agent of one of the provincial satellite TV stations partnered with the Company. The Company terminated its cooperation with this TV station and its agent upon expiration of the 2014 contract on December 31, 2014. The remaining balance of this deposit and prepayment as of December 31, 2015 was collected in January 2016.

For advertising resources purchase contracts signed by the Company with its resources providers, the Company was required to make deposits, which were either applied to the contract amounts that were needed to be paid with the consent of the counterparty or to be refunded to the Company of the remaining balance upon expiration of the cooperation. Overdue deposits represented the portion of the contractual deposits, which related advertising resources purchase contracts had been completed as of each of the reporting dates with no further cooperation. Based on the assessment of the collectability of these overdue deposits as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company provided approximately US$654,000 and US$668,000 allowance for doubtful accounts, respectively, which was related to the deposits of its internet advertising and TV advertising business segment. For the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, no allowance for doubtful accounts was provided or reversed.

The Company purchases internet resources from large internet search engines and technical services from suppliers to attract more internet traffic to its advertising portals and provide value-added services to its clients.

Deposits to internet resources providers are paid as contractual deposits to the Company’s resources and services suppliers. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, deposit to internet resources providers primarily consisted of the contractual deposits paid for purchasing internet resources from two of the Company’s largest internet resources suppliers.

According to the contracts signed between the Company and its suppliers, the Company is normally required to pay the contract amounts in advance. These prepayments will be transferred to cost of revenues when the related services are provided.

Deposits to other service providers consisted of an approximately US$0.75 million deposit to an intermediary service provider, which the Company engaged to facilitate the Company to find, select and negotiate with its internet, TV or other media resource suppliers, and another approximately US$0.75 million deposit for an advisory contract related to finding buyers for liansuo.com and new investors for the Company. The contract with the intermediary service provider expired on April 30, 2016 and was extended to October 31, 2016. In accordance with the extended contract, the deposit will be refunded to the Company no later than December 31, 2016.

Related parties of the Company represented direct or indirect unconsolidated investees of the Company or entities that are directly or indirectly owned by Mr. Handong Cheng or Mr. Xuanfu Liu, the owners of the Company’s PRC VIEs, Business Opportunities Online and Beijing CNET Online before the Offshore Restructuring. The Company provides advertising and marketing services to these related parties in its normal course of business on the same terms as those provided to its unrelated clients. Due from related parties represented the outstanding receivables for the advertising and marketing services that the Company provided to these related parties as of each reporting date. As of June 30, 2016, due from related parties also included short-term working capital loans of RMB1.0 million (approximately US$0.15 million) and RMB0.8 million (approximately US$0.12 million) to Chuangshi Meiwei and Guohua Shiji, respectively. The working capital loans are non-interest bearing and needs to be repaid to the Company within one year.

In the fourth fiscal quarter of 2015, the Company committed to a plan to sell one of its internet advertising operating VIEs, Beijing Chuang Fu Tian Xia, also known as liansuo.com., which did not qualify for presentation as a discontinued operation, as it was not considered a significant portion of the Company’s internet advertising and data service business segment. The Company expects to consummate the transaction before the end of fiscal 2016 and does not expect to have any continued involvement with the entity after the disposal date.

The Company classified the assets and liabilities of the disposal group as held for sale as of each reporting date and presented separately in the asset and liability section, respectively. The assets and liabilities held by the disposal group are as follows:

Equity method investments

As of December 31, 2015, the Company beneficially owned 23.18% and 25.5% equity interest in Shenzhen Mingshan and Zhao Shang Ke Hubei, respectively. Based on the facts of the significant decline in level of business activities during 2015, insufficient amount of working capital and the lack of commitment from majority shareholders, these two investment affiliates had become dormant and the possibility of the business recovery is remote. As a result, the Company reduced the carrying value of these investments to zero as of December 31, 2015.

In 2015, the Company co-incorporated ChinaNet Korea with three unaffiliated individuals and obtained 40% of the equity interest in ChinaNet Korea. During the first fiscal quarter of 2016, the Company and other investors of ChinaNet Korea deregistered the entity and re-incorporated it with new investors involved. The Company invested US$7,500 and obtained 15% of the equity interest in ChinaNet Korea through the re-incorporation. ChinaNet Korea has not conduct any business activities.

Cost method investments

As of June 30, 2016, the Company beneficially owned a 19% equity interest in ChinaNet Chuang Tou and Guohua Shiji, respectively, a 15% equity interest in ChinaNet Korea and a 10% equity interest in Chuangshi Meiwei and Beijing Saturday, respectively. The Company accounts for these investments under cost method of accounting. The following table summarizes the movement of the investments in cost method investees for the six months ended June 30, 2016:

Depreciation expenses in the aggregate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were approximately US$137,000 and US$174,000, respectively. Depreciation expenses in the aggregate for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were approximately US$64,000 and US$87,000, respectively.

Amortization expenses in aggregate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were approximately US$623,000 and US$714,000, respectively. Amortization expenses in aggregate for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were approximately US$312,000 and US$357,000, respectively.

Based on the current carrying value of the finite-lived intangible assets recorded, which weighted average remaining useful life was 7.13 years as of June 30, 2016, and assuming no further subsequent impairment of the underlying intangible assets, the estimated future amortization expenses is approximately US$712,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2016, approximately US$952,000 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and approximately US$946,000 each year for the year ended December 31, 2018 through 2020.

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, intangible assets, the related accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment loss of approximately US$1.64 million, US$0.97 million and US$0.67 million, respectively, was decreased due to disposal of a VIE during the period.

In May 2015, the Company entered into a contract to purchase software products related to cloud video management system from an unrelated third party with a total contract amount of RMB9.5 million (approximately US$1.4 million). As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had paid in the aggregate of RMB6.65 million (approximately US$1.0 million) in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in the contract. The Company is currently in test trials for this system. The transaction as contemplated under the contract is expected to be consummated in 2016.

On May 5, 2015, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Beijing Jinrun Fangzhou Science & Technology Co, Ltd. (“Jinrun Fangzhou”), a public company listed on the National Equities Exchange and Quotations of the PRC (the “NEEQ”), pursuant to which Jinrun Fangzhou agreed to purchase 2,800,000 shares of common stock of the Company for an aggregate purchase price of US$3,500,000. On May 26, 2015, the Company entered into another Securities Purchase Agreement with Dongsys Innovation (Beijing) Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Dongsys Innovation”), a public company listed on the NEEQ, pursuant to which Dongsys Innovation agreed to purchase 1,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company for an aggregate purchase price of US$1,250,000.

In accordance with the Securities Purchase Agreements described above, Jinrun Fangzhou and Dongsys Innovation were required to pay 10% of its respective total purchase price as guarantee payments within five days of the date the agreements were signed, and pay an additional 15% of its respective total purchase price within thirty days of the date of the agreements were signed, and pay the remaining 75% of its respective purchase price at the closing which shall take place on the date mutually agreed to by the parties.

As of June 30, 2016, the Company has received the 10% guarantee payment and 15% prepayment in an aggregate amount equal to US$807,000 from Jinrun Fangzhou, and the 10% guarantee payment in an amount equal to US$117,000 from Dongsys Innovation, respectively.

Due to certain restriction stipulated in the “Measures for Overseas Investment Management” issued by the Ministry of Commerce of the PRC (the “MOFCOM”), the Company and its investors experienced difficulties in obtaining approval for the transactions from the MOFCOM. As a result, on May 12, 2016, the Company terminated the security purchase agreement with the two investors, respectively. The Company expects to refund the guarantee payment and prepayment to the investors before December 31, 2016. As agreed by the parties, if the Company fails to fully refund the amounts before December 31, 2016, the Company will bear a 12% annualized interest rate for the unpaid amounts and the amounts shall be refunded to the investors no later than December 31, 2017.

The entities within the Company file separate tax returns in the respective tax jurisdictions in which they operate.

i). The Company is incorporated in the state of Nevada. Under the current law of Nevada, the Company is not subject to state corporate income tax. Following the Share Exchange, the Company became a holding company and does not conduct any substantial operations of its own. No provision for federal corporate income tax has been made in the financial statements as the Company has no assessable profits for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016, or any prior periods. The Company does not provide for U.S. taxes or foreign withholding taxes on undistributed earnings from its non-U.S. subsidiaries because such earnings are intended to be reinvested indefinitely. If undistributed earnings were distributed, foreign tax credits could become available under current law to reduce the resulting U.S. income tax liability.

ii). China Net BVI was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”). Under the current law of the BVI, China Net BVI is not subject to tax on income or capital gains. Additionally, upon payments of dividends by China Net BVI to its shareholders, no BVI withholding tax will be imposed.

iii). China Net HK was incorporated in Hong Kong and does not conduct any substantial operations of its own. No provision for Hong Kong profits tax has been made in the financial statements as China Net HK has no assessable profits for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 or any prior periods. Additionally, upon payments of dividends by China Net HK to its shareholders, no Hong Kong withholding tax will be imposed.

iv). The Company’s PRC operating subsidiaries and VIEs, being incorporated in the PRC, are governed by the income tax law of the PRC and is subject to PRC enterprise income tax (“EIT”). The EIT rate of PRC is 25%, which applies to both domestic and foreign invested enterprises.

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, all of the preferential income tax treatments enjoyed by the Company’s PRC subsidiaries and VIEs were based on the current applicable laws and regulations of the PRC and approved by the related government regulatory authorities and local tax authorities where the Company’s respective PRC subsidiaries and VIEs operate in. Business Opportunity Online and Business Opportunity Online Hubei were most affected by these preferential income tax treatments within the structure of the Company. The preferential income tax treatments are subject to change in accordance with the PRC government economic development policies and regulations. These preferential income tax treatments are primarily determined by the regulation and policies of the PRC government in the context of the overall economic policy and strategy. As a result, the uncertainty of theses preferential income tax treatments are subject to, but not limited to, the PRC government policy on supporting any specific industry’s development under the outlook and strategy of overall macroeconomic development.

Service revenues provided by the Company’s PRC operating subsidiaries and VIEs were subject to Value Added Tax (“VAT”). VAT rate for provision of modern services (other than lease of corporeal movables) is 6% and for small scale taxpayer, 3%. Therefore, for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s service revenues are subject to VAT at a rate of 6%, after deducting the VAT paid for the services purchased from suppliers, or at a rate of 3% without any deduction of VAT paid for the services purchased from suppliers. The surcharges of the VAT is 12%-14% of the VAT, depending on which tax jurisdiction the Company’s PRC operating subsidiaries and VIE operate in.

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, taxes payable consists of:

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, taxes payable of approximately US$0.10 million was decreased due to disposal of a VIE during the period.

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s income tax (expense)/benefit consisted of:

The Company’s deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2016 and changes for the six months then ended were as follows:

Deferred tax liabilities arose on the recognition of the identifiable intangible assets acquired from acquisition transactions in previous years. Reversal for the six months ended June 30, 2016 of approximately US$58,000 was due to amortization of the acquired intangible assets.

The Company’s deferred tax assets at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

The net operating losses carried forward incurred by the Company (excluding its PRC operating subsidiary and VIEs) were approximately US$16,061,000 and US$14,903,000 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, which loss carry forwards gradually expire over time, the last of which expires in 2036. A full valuation allowance has been recorded because it is considered more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized through sufficient future earnings of the entity to which the operating losses relate.

The net operating losses carried forward (excluding bad debts provision, amortization of intangible assets acquired from business combinations and non-deductible expenses) incurred by the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs were approximately US$16,312,000 and US$15,657,000 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, which loss carry forwards gradually expire over time, the last of which expires in 2021. The related deferred tax asset was calculated based on the respective net operating losses incurred by each of the PRC subsidiaries and VIEs and the respective corresponding enacted tax rate that will be in effect in the period in which the losses are expected to be utilized. The Company recorded approximately US$297,000 and US$96,000 valuation allowance for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and recorded approximately US$137,000 and US$16,000 valuation allowance for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, because it is considered more likely than not that this portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized through sufficient future earnings of the entities to which the operating losses relate. The Company also utilized approximately US$193,000 and US$158,000 deferred tax assets for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016, respectively.

Full valuation allowance to bad debts provision related deferred tax assets were recorded because it is considered more likely than not that this portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized through bad debts verification by the local tax authorities where the PRC subsidiary and VIEs operate in.

The Company’s non-current portion of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were attributable to different tax-paying components of the entity, which were under different tax jurisdictions. Therefore, in accordance with ASC Topic 740 “Income taxes”, the non-current portion of deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities were presented separately in the Company’s balance sheets.

The tax authority of the PRC government conducts periodic and ad hoc tax filing reviews on business enterprises operating in the PRC after those enterprises had completed their relevant tax filings, hence the Company’s tax filings may not be finalized. It is therefore uncertain as to whether the PRC tax authority may take different views about the Company’s tax filings which may lead to additional tax liabilities.

Long-term borrowing from a director is a non-interest bearing loan from a director of the Company relating to the original paid-in capital contribution in the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary Rise King WFOE, which is not expected to be repaid within one year.

As most of the Company’s operations are conducted through its PRC subsidiary and VIEs, the Company’s ability to pay dividends is primarily dependent on receiving distributions of funds from its PRC subsidiary and VIEs. Relevant PRC statutory laws and regulations permit payments of dividends by its PRC subsidiary and VIEs only out of their retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations and after it has met the PRC requirements for appropriation to statutory reserves. Paid in capital of the PRC subsidiary and VIEs included in the Company’s consolidated net assets are also non-distributable for dividend purposes.

In accordance with the PRC regulations on Enterprises with Foreign Investment, a WFOE established in the PRC is required to provide certain statutory reserves, namely general reserve fund, the enterprise expansion fund and staff welfare and bonus fund which are appropriated from net profit as reported in the enterprise’s PRC statutory accounts. A WFOE is required to allocate at least 10% of its annual after-tax profit to the general reserve until such reserve has reached 50% of its registered capital based on the enterprise’s PRC statutory accounts. Appropriations to the enterprise expansion fund and staff welfare and bonus fund are at the discretion of the board of directors. The aforementioned reserves can only be used for specific purposes and are not distributable as cash dividends. Rise King WFOE is subject to the above mandated restrictions on distributable profits. Additionally, in accordance with the Company Law of the PRC, a domestic enterprise is required to provide a statutory common reserve of at least 10% of its annual after-tax profit until such reserve has reached 50% of its registered capital based on the enterprise’s PRC statutory accounts. A domestic enterprise is also required to provide for a discretionary surplus reserve, at the discretion of the board of directors. The aforementioned reserves can only be used for specific purposes and are not distributable as cash dividends. All of the Company’s PRC VIEs are subject to the above mandated restrictions on distributable profits.

As a result of these PRC laws and regulations, the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs are restricted in their ability to transfer a portion of their net assets to the Company. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, net assets restricted in the aggregate, which include paid-in capital and statutory reserve funds of the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs that are included in the Company’s consolidated net assets, was approximately US$8.1 million and US$6.7 million, respectively.

The current PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law also imposed a 10% withholding income tax for dividends distributed by a foreign invested enterprise to its immediate holding company outside China. A lower withholding tax rate will be applied if there is a tax treaty arrangement between mainland China and the jurisdiction of the foreign holding company. Holding companies in Hong Kong, for example, will be subject to a 5% rate. Rise King WFOE is invested by its immediate holding company in Hong Kong and will be entitled to the 5% preferential withholding tax rate upon distribution of the dividends to its immediate holding company.

The ability of the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs to make dividends and other payments to the Company may also be restricted by changes in applicable foreign exchange and other laws and regulations.

Foreign currency exchange regulation in China is primarily governed by the following rules:

Currently, under the Administration Rules, Renminbi is freely convertible for current account items, including the distribution of dividends, interest payments, trade and service related foreign exchange transactions, but not for capital account items, such as direct investments, loans, repatriation of investments and investments in securities outside of China, unless the prior approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (the “SAFE”) is obtained and prior registration with the SAFE is made. Foreign-invested enterprises like Rise King WFOE that need foreign exchange for the distribution of profits to its shareholders may effect payment from their foreign exchange accounts or purchase and pay foreign exchange rates at the designated foreign exchange banks to their foreign shareholders by producing board resolutions for such profit distribution. Based on their needs, foreign-invested enterprises are permitted to open foreign exchange settlement accounts for current account receipts and payments of foreign exchange along with specialized accounts for capital account receipts and payments of foreign exchange at certain designated foreign exchange banks.

Although the current Exchange Rules allow the convertibility of Chinese Renminbi into foreign currency for current account items, conversion of Chinese Renminbi into foreign exchange for capital items, such as foreign direct investment, loans or securities, requires the approval of SAFE, which is under the authority of the People’s Bank of China. These approvals, however, do not guarantee the availability of foreign currency conversion. The Company cannot be sure that it will be able to obtain all required conversion approvals for its operations or the Chinese regulatory authorities will not impose greater restrictions on the convertibility of Chinese Renminbi in the future. Currently, most of the Company’s retained earnings are generated in Renminbi. Any future restrictions on currency exchanges may limit the Company’s ability to use its retained earnings generated in Renminbi to make dividends or other payments in U.S. dollars or fund possible business activities outside China.

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, there was approximately US$20.9 million and US$22.9 million retained earnings in the aggregate, respectively, which was generated by the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs in Renminbi included in the Company’s consolidated net assets, aside from US$2.6 million and US$2.8 million of statutory reserve funds as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, that may be affected by increased restrictions on currency exchanges in the future, and accordingly, may further limit the Company’s PRC subsidiary’s and VIEs’ ability to make dividends or other payments in U.S. dollars to the Company, in addition to the approximately US$8.1 million and US$6.7 million of restricted net assets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, as discussed above.

Revenue from related parties:

Full time employees of the Company in the PRC participate in a government mandated defined contribution plan, pursuant to which certain pension benefits, medical care, employee housing fund and other welfare benefits are provided to employees. Chinese labor regulations require that the PRC subsidiaries of the Company make contributions to the government for these benefits based on certain percentages of the employees’ salaries. The employee benefits were expensed as incurred. The Company has no legal obligation for the benefits beyond the contributions made. The total amounts for such employee benefits were approximately US$298,000 and US$279,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The total amounts for such employee benefits were approximately US$144,000 and US$135,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Credit risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other receivables and prepayments and deposits to suppliers. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held by major financial institutions located in Mainland China, which management believes are of high credit quality.

Risk arising from operations in foreign countries

All of the Company’s operations are conducted within the PRC. The Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to various political, economic, and other risks and uncertainties inherent in the PRC. Among other risks, the Company’s operations in the PRC are subject to the risks of restrictions on transfer of funds, changing taxation policies, foreign exchange restrictions; and political conditions and governmental regulations.

Currency convertibility risk

Significant part of the Company’s businesses is transacted in RMB, which is not freely convertible into foreign currencies. All foreign exchange transactions take place either through the People’s Bank of China or other banks authorized to buy and sell foreign currencies at the exchange rates quoted by the People’s Bank of China. Approval of foreign currency payments by the People’s Bank of China or other regulatory institutions requires submitting a payment application form together with suppliers’ invoices and signed contracts. These exchange control measures imposed by the PRC government authorities may restrict the ability of the Company’s PRC subsidiary and VIEs to transfer its net assets, which to the Company through loans, advances or cash dividends.

Concentration of customers

There was no single customer who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for the six or three months ended June 30, 2016.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, two customers individually accounted for 17% and 14% of the Company’s revenues, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, one of the two customers individually accounted for 11% of the Company’s revenues. Except for the aforementioned customers, there was no other single customer who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s revenues for the six or three months ended June 30, 2015.

As of June 30, 2016, two customers individually accounted for 22% and 22% of the Company’s accounts receivables, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, the same two customers individually accounted for 24% and 17% of the Company’s accounts receivables, respectively. Except for the afore-mentioned, there was no other single customer who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s accounts receivable as of June 30, 2016 or December 31, 2015.

Concentration of suppliers

For the six months ended June 30, 2016, two suppliers individually accounted for 60% and 12% of the Company’s cost of revenues, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the same two suppliers individually accounted for 60% and 10% of the Company’s cost of revenues, respectively. Except for the afore-mentioned, there was no other single supplier who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s cost of revenues for the six or three months ended June 30, 2016.

For the six months ended June 30, 2015, two suppliers individually accounted for 51% and 32% of the Company’s cost of revenues, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2015, the same two suppliers individually accounted for 28% and 48% of the Company’s cost of revenues, respectively. Except for the afore-mentioned, there was no other single supplier who accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s cost of revenues for the six or three months ended June 30, 2015.

The following table sets forth the Company’s operating lease commitment as of June 30, 2016:

Excluding rental expenses included in discontinued operation, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, rental expenses under operating leases were approximately US$310,000 and US$210,000, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, rental expenses under operating leases were approximately US$140,000 and US$105,000, respectively.

In May 2015, the Company entered into a contract to purchase software products related to cloud video management system from an unrelated third party with a total contract amount of RMB9.5 million (approximately US$1.4 million). As of June 30, 2016, the Company had paid in the aggregate of RMB6.65 million (approximately US$1.0 million) in accordance with the payment schedule set forth in the contract. The transaction as contemplated under the contract is expected to be consummated in 2016 and the remaining unpaid contract amount is expected to be paid in 2016.

In accordance with the contract entered into between the Company and one of its largest internet resources suppliers, the Company agreed to purchase in the aggregate of RMB100 million (“the minimum consumption amount”) (approximately US$15.1 million) from this supplier for a one-year period commencing on June 13, 2015. In accordance with this contract, if the Company fails to meet the minimum consumption amount, the supplier is allowed to require the Company to retroactively compensate the supplier in cash the difference between the granted discount rate set forth based on the minimum consumption amount and any revised discount rate set forth based on further negotiation between the two parties, if the Company is able to achieve 50% of the minimum consumption amount. If the Company fails to achieve 50% of the minimum consumption amount, the Company is not eligible to enjoy any discount. The contract expired on June 12, 2016, based on the final agreed compensation plan between the two parties, the Company compensated the supplier of approximately US$0.13 million for failing to meet the minimum consumption amount, which equaled to the deposit withheld by the supplier upon entering into the original contract in June 2015.

Legal Proceedings

On October 26, 2015, Business Opportunity Online, one of the Company’s indirect wholly owned VIEs, filed a civil action against Beijing 58 Information Technology Co., Ltd. (“Beijing 58”) in the Chaoyang District People’s Court of Beijing. Business Opportunity Online is seeking a court order to establish that it owns a 17.5% equity interest in Beijing 58, one of the VIEs owned by 58.com Inc. On January 20, 2016, the Chaoyang District People’s Court of Beijing rendered its ruling that Business Opportunity Online did not own 17.5% equity interest in Beijing 58. On February 15, 2016, Business Opportunity Online appealed the decision in the Beijing Third Intermediate People’s Court. On May 30, 2016, the Beijing Third Intermediate People’s Court rendered its final ruling that Business Opportunity Online did not own 17.5% equity interest in Beijing 58.

The Company exited its brand management and sales channel building business segment in the fourth fiscal quarter of 2015, operated by one of its VIEs, Quanzhou City Zhilang Network Technology Co., Ltd. (“Quanzhou Zhi Lang”), which qualified for presentation as a discontinued operation. In June 2016, the Company disposed Quanzhou Zhi Lang to an unaffiliated third-party, the loss incurred from the disposal was also included in results of operations of discontinued operation, presented as a separate component in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for all periods presented. Major classes of line items constituting pre-tax net loss and net loss of the discontinued operation for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, are as follows:

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, depreciation and amortization expenses included in operating expenses of the discontinued operation were immaterial. There were no significant capital expenditures, operating or investing noncash items incurred in the discontinued operation for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 or 2015.

The Company follows ASC Topic 280 “Segment Reporting”, which requires that companies disclose segment data based on how management makes decisions about allocating resources to segments and evaluating their performance. Reportable operating segments include components of an entity about which separate financial information is available and which operating results are regularly reviewed by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, to make decisions about resources to be allocated to the segment and assess each operating segment’s performance.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 (Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 (Unaudited)

Basic and diluted loss per share for each of the periods presented are calculated as follows (All amounts, except number of shares and per share data, are presented in thousands of U.S. dollars):

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2016, the diluted loss per share calculation for continuing and discontinued operations did not include options to purchase up to 2,088,040 shares of the Company’s common stock, because they were out of the money, and did not include 1,998,926 shares of unvested restricted common stock, because their effect was anti-dilutive, as the Company incurred a loss for the periods from both continuing and discontinued operations.

For the six and three months ended June 30, 2015, the diluted loss per share calculation for continuing and discontinued operations did not include 2,666,667 shares of unvested restricted common stock and exercisable in-the-money options to purchase up to 894,940 shares of the Company’s common stock, because their effect was anti-dilutive, as the Company incurred a loss for the periods from both continuing and discontinued operations.

The Company granted 100,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to its investor relations services provider, in exchange for its services to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. These shares were valued at US$1.20 per share, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Total compensation expense recognized for the service was US$30,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, and US$15,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015.

The Company granted 350,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a management consulting service provider in exchange for its services to the Company for a 24-month period commencing on May 1, 2015. These shares were valued at US$1.57 per share, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Total compensation expense recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately US$137,400 and US$45,800, respectively. Total compensation expense recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was approximately US$68,700 and US$45,800, respectively.

The Company granted 300,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a technical service provider in exchange for its services to the Company for a 12-month period commencing on August 1, 2014. These shares were valued at US$0.67 per share, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Total compensation expense recognized for the six and three months ended June 30, 2015 was approximately US$100,500 and US$50,250, respectively.

On December 30, 2014, the Company issued 4,200,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to its executive officers, of which 1,533,333 restricted shares were vested upon issuance, 1,333,333 restricted shares were vested on December 30, 2015 and the remaining 1,333,334 restricted shares will be vested on December 30, 2016. The restricted stock was valued at $1.17 per share, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Total compensation expenses recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was US$780,000. Total compensation expenses recognized for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was US$390,000.

On September 14, 2015, under its 2015 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan, the Company granted its employees in the aggregate of 665,592 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock, which will be vested on the third anniversary of the date of the grant. These shares were valued at $0.84 per share, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The Company adopted a 5% forfeiture rate for recognition of the related compensation expenses of these unvested shares, total compensation expenses recognized for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately US$88,200 and US$44,100, respectively.

On September 14, 2015, under its 2015 Omnibus Securities and Incentive Plan, the Company also granted 5-year common stock purchase options to its employees, in the aggregate, to purchase up to 1,193,100 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock at an exercise price of US$0.84 per share, of which 397,700 options was vested upon the date of grant, 397,700 options will be vested on September 14, 2016 and the remaining 397,700 options will be vested on September 14, 2017. These options were valuated at US$0.41-US$0.56 per option. The Company adopted a 5% forfeiture rate for recognition of the related compensation expenses of the unvested part of options, total compensation expenses recognized for these options for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately US$92,500 and US$46,250, respectively.

On April 1, 2016, the Company granted 40,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in aggregate to two marketing service providers in exchange for their services to the Company for a 12-month period commencing on April 1, 2016. These shares were valued at US$0.69 per share, the closing bid price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. Total compensation expense recognized for the six and three months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately US$6,900.

Options issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and their movements during the six months then ended are as follows:

The aggregate unrecognized share-based compensation expenses as of June 30, 2016 and 2015 is approximately US$1,693,000 and US$2,890,000, respectively.

The Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued, and has determined that there are no such events that are material to the financial statements.